Current location:home page > Food Technology

USDA Investigates Detection of GE Glyphosate-resistant Wheat

Further testing by USDA laboratories indicates the presence of the same GE glyphosate-resistant whea…
Further testing by USDA laboratories indicates the presence of the same GE glyphosate-resistant wheat variety that Monsanto was authorised to field test in 16 states from 1998 to 2005.

APHIS launched a formal investigation after being notified by an Oregon State University scientist that initial tests of wheat samples from an Oregon farm indicated the possible presence of GE glyphosate-resistant wheat plants. There are no GE wheat varieties approved for sale or in commercial production in the United States or elsewhere at this time.

The detection of this wheat variety does not pose a food safety concern. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) completed a voluntary consultation on the safety of food and feed derived from this GE glyphosate-resistant wheat variety in 2004.

For the consultation, the developer provided information to FDA to support the safety of this wheat variety. FDA completed the voluntary consultation with no further questions concerning the safety of grain and forage derived from this wheat, meaning that this variety is as safe as non-GE wheat currently on the market.

“We are taking this situation very seriously and have launched a formal investigation,” said Michael Firko, Acting Deputy Administrator for APHIS’ Biotechnology Regulatory Services.

“Our first priority is to as quickly as possible determine the circumstances and extent of the situation and how it happened. We are collaborating with state, industry, and trading partners on this situation and are committed to providing timely information about our findings. USDA will put all necessary resources towards this investigation.”

The Plant Protection Act (PPA) provides for substantial penalties for serious infractions. Should APHIS determine that this situation was the result of a violation of the PPA, APHIS has the authority to seek penalties for such a violation including civil penalties up to $1,000,000 and has the authority to refer the matter for criminal prosecution, if appropriate.

Related articles

Coke opens new 'closed loop' site to double UK rPET output

The ₤15m (€18.65m) site in the country of Lincolnshire was opened by Environment Minister Lord Taylo…

Michelman receives US$2.5m grant to build R&D facility

The Michelman Advanced Materials Collaboration Center will be built in Ohio and is planned to open b…

Wine label printer Tapp buys Ben Franklin Press & Label

Tapp Label Technologies (TLT), a manufacturer of pressure sensitive labels for wine and spirits indu…

Attitudes toward organic labels depend on consumers' values

Labeling food as “organic" actually may flip the “halo" effect for ethical food labels depending on…

Sirane: The Soft-Fruit Packaging Revolution Has Begun

Sirane: The Soft-Fruit Packaging Revolution Has Begun

It has been developed in partnership with some of the key players in the soft fruit industry. Togeth…

Grassland Dairy Products launches Non-GMO Project Verified butter products

Grassland Dairy Products, Inc. has launched Non-GMO Project Verified butter products for the dairy m…