Current location:home page > Laws and regulations

Labour's bid to fine abusive supermarkets fails

admin2 weeks ago (05-19)Laws and regulations26
Opposition peers proposed the changes as an amendment to the Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA) Bill d…
Opposition peers proposed the changes as an amendment to the Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA) Bill during the Bill's report stage in the House of Lords last month.


Two-year delay

Shadow environment secretary Mary Creagh welcomed the government's decision to introduce an adjudicator to police the Groceries Supply Code of Practice (GSCOP), which came in under Labour in February 2010. However, she expressed disappointment at the "two-year delay" in appointing an adjudicator.

"We would like to see the power to fine supermarkets for breach of the Code on the face of the bill,"
 said Creagh. "At the moment it would need to be enacted under secondary legislation. And we think people shouldn't have to wait another six months or a year for that to happen."

Peers completed consideration of the GCA Bill at report stage on July 16. Labour had proposed an amendment regarding the powers of the adjudicator who, under the bill, would be able to name and shame offenders if a retailer was found to have breached the code, and might have the power to impose fines in the future.

Peers reject Labour amendment

Labour called for the adjudicator to have powers to impose fines as soon as the post was established. Labour peer Lord Whitty said "naming and shaming is not enough". However, peers rejected the amendment by 217 votes to 186 a government majority of 31.

Farmers and smaller food and drink manufacturers remain concerned about the imbalance in power between the four major supermarkets and their suppliers. They want an adjudicator in place as soon as possible to stop the multiples from abusing their power.

Had an adjudicator been in place, it might have made Morrisons think twice about trying to get 200300 of its suppliers to absorb up to £500,000 cuts each in the price of their contracts last month (see p11).

A number of suppliers, speaking anonymously to Food Manufacture, spoke of the unusually "aggressive" tactics Morrisons had adopted in demanding cuts to prices that had already been agreed.

"We welcomed the fact that the government will now allow third-party organisations to refer to [the adjudicator],"
 said Craigh. "That is progress."

Look out for the Big Interview with Mary Creagh in the September issue of Food Manufacture magazine.

Related articles

FSSAI extends timeline for submission of annual returns by FBOs till July

The apex food regulator, FSSAI, has decided to extend the timeline for submission of annual returns…

FSSAI issues draft notification for regulating food sold to school kids

Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has issued a draft notification for regulating…

CFSA Solicited Public Opinions on 2 Novel Food Additives

On 24 December, 2018, China National Centre for Food Safety Risk Assessment (CFSA) solicited public…

Information on Food and cosmetics prohibited to entry into our country in October 2018

Information on Food and cosmetics prohibited to entry into our country in October 2018

In October 2018, the National Customs accepted supervision at the entry port, and detected 61 batche…

How Is Health Food Managed in China?

Health food refers to food products which are claimed to have certain specific health functions or c…

FDA approves new drug to treat influenza

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Xofluza (baloxavir marboxil) for the treatment…